Compare And Contrast Three Authors Say About Nature Of “technology`

Author NameCourse NameGuide NameMarch 9 , 2008Technology : Nature and Effects on anatomic mental synthesis and Behavior of OrganizationsIntroductionThe ever-changing nature of apply science has induced m all a(prenominal) studies on the semblance between engine room and placement or brass sectional twist to be more(prenominal) specific . As engineering evolves from one aim of sophistication to a high direct , it is obvious that the entire gamut of production from design , equipment , procedures , operators , supplies and actual to the purlieu undergoes changes . It to a fault follows naturally that such(prenominal) wide-ranging changes ar stick bring out to be reflected in the governing structure also . The research here is - to what extent does engineering science affect or gravel fundamental law structure ? The three studies under precondition take radically different stands on the issue . bit `The care of Innovation by fire Stalker (1961 ) asserts that changing engine room and commercialize place conditions define the management system of some(prenominal) institution , `The Measurement of Organization Structures by DS Pugh (1973 ) states that technology by itself has a very negligible effect on the structure of organizations , especially manufacturing organizations , provided combines with new(prenominal) contextual dimensions such as surface , to exert a telling mildew on the organization structure Charles Perrow (1984 /1999 ) in `Normal Accidents , active with high-risk Technologies , on the other hand , contends that the present level of sophistication and complexities in technologies confirm led to a pip in which organization structures , however developed or fit they may be to the changing technological situations , are otiose to cope with or handle system s with `interactive complexities and tight c! ouplingIn many another(prenominal) ways , Burns Stalker and Perrow assume that management has a very minimal role to dawdle in the organisation of organization structure Burns Stalker implies that technology and market conditions or the changes in them almost instinctively determine the structure of organizations i .e . organization structure changes in response to changes in technical and market situations .

Perrow takes control out of the hands of domain and management in situations that are the result of the intricacies of technology and unexplainable to the intellect of benignant beings . Pugh however attri savees senior managemen t with free lance depicted object to alter the structure of an organization by as more than as the combined effects of all other contextual dimensions of the organization itselfBurns Stalker and Perrow describe extreme situations . Pugh adopts a more rational and holistic approach . All organizations impart be affected by technology and the changes in technology , but technology by itself could hardly lead to spontaneous organization organization structure . It is management that will have to derive the technology , its changes and the related implications and mould the organization to resolve and align effectively to changing environments . The human management calculate has to play a decisive and deliberate role in define and implementing different kinds of organization structure for different types of technology situations victorious into consideration not only the technological position but also all other factors that could affect the organization structureThe optimu m or ideal organization structure for any technology ! situation could in all possibilities not be the shopworn or...If you want to get a full essay, set out it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay